返回列表 回复 发帖
The classic statement of safety consistently approved by the courts, including the House of Lords in the Evia (No.02), and applicable to both ports, and berth and to time charters and voyage charters is :

“A port will not be safe unless, in the relevant period of time, the particular ship can reach it, use it and return from it without, in the absence of some abnormal occurrence, being exposed to danger which cannot be avoided by good navigation and seamanship”.

判断港口或者泊位是否安全的三个条件:
(1)        正常情况下船舶能否安全进出;
(2)        当地充分预报坏天气;
(3)        有没有减少或者避免危险的设施或措施,如拖轮引水等。
上述条件满足下,如果采取良好船艺即可避免风险,就不存在不安全港口或者泊位的问题。

不安全可分为两种:实质上的不安全和政治上的不安全。

在我看来,该案例中,即使工人拒绝作业,码头仍然是安全的。 这个案例应该适用罢工条款。
返回列表