admin

有关你的这个问题，在英国法律下可去节录最权威的《Benjamin's Sale of goods》第六版之20-018段，如下：
  
    “Under a 'classic' f.o.b. contract, the seller is prima facie responsible for the cost of getting the goods over the ship's rail. He is not responsible for any further expenses, such as the expenses of stowing the goods once they are on board unless the contract is on 'f.o.b. and stowed' terms. If the contract contains no such term but the seller in fact pays charges of stowage, he is entitled to recover these from the buyer. One would, conversely, expect the buyer to be able to recover from the seller any charges paid by the buyer, under his contract with the carrier, of getting the goods from the quay over the ship's rail.”

    换言之，把货物装上船的责任在FOB价格的买卖下是在卖方头上，毕竟FOB价格并不是另一种的交易就是FAS（free alongside ship或称船旁交货），FAS才是卖方不需要把货物装上船舶。由于你的这货物是散装矿，所以也不存在装上船还需要堆货的问题。这样看来，我不认为在印尼装货的浮吊费用是需要你作为买方要承担的。

    如果印尼卖方不想承担浮吊费用或者没有这种设备，换言之是非要使用FOB买方指派船舶的船吊不可，他就应该在订立买卖合约的时候去说明买方指派船舶必须要有船吊与可供卖方使用。

    希望这样可以解答到你的问题。